World Library  


Add to Book Shelf
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Book

The Political Economy of Public Participation in Natural Hazard Decisions – a Theoretical Review and an Exemplary Case of the Decision Framework of Austrian Hazard Zone Mapping : Volume 8, Issue 2 (25/03/2008)

By Gamper, C. D.

Click here to view

Book Id: WPLBN0004017297
Format Type: PDF Article :
File Size: Pages 9
Reproduction Date: 2015

Title: The Political Economy of Public Participation in Natural Hazard Decisions – a Theoretical Review and an Exemplary Case of the Decision Framework of Austrian Hazard Zone Mapping : Volume 8, Issue 2 (25/03/2008)  
Author: Gamper, C. D.
Volume: Vol. 8, Issue 2
Language: English
Subject: Science, Natural, Hazards
Collections: Periodicals: Journal and Magazine Collection (Contemporary), Copernicus GmbH
Historic
Publication Date:
2008
Publisher: Copernicus Gmbh, Göttingen, Germany
Member Page: Copernicus Publications

Citation

APA MLA Chicago

Gamper, C. D. (2008). The Political Economy of Public Participation in Natural Hazard Decisions – a Theoretical Review and an Exemplary Case of the Decision Framework of Austrian Hazard Zone Mapping : Volume 8, Issue 2 (25/03/2008). Retrieved from http://www.worldebookfair.com/


Description
Description: alpS Centre for Natural Hazard Management, Innsbruck, Austria. It is often argued whether public good decisions with a high degree of uncertainty, such as public decisions for the prevention against natural hazards are, should be solely left to be taken by expert bodies. Imperfect knowledge of experts may leave an uncertain level of risk to the public or the affected groups of persons or expert decisions might not reflect the affected parties' preferences in whose interest they should ideally act. Direct participation of affected parties in such decisions is believed to be valuable in many ways. On the one hand, it allows final decision makers' choices to be more accepted among stakeholders and on the other hand, knowledge by the experts can be complemented with the one by affected parties. From a political economic viewpoint it will be discussed in the present paper whether this process can be viewed to provide a better decision-making process by looking at an exemplary case of danger zone planning in Austria.

Summary
The political economy of public participation in natural hazard decisions – a theoretical review and an exemplary case of the decision framework of Austrian hazard zone mapping

Excerpt
Beierle, T. C. and Konisky, D. M.: What are we gaining from stakeholder involvement? Observations from environmental planning in the Great Lakes, Environ. Plann. C, 19, 515–527, 2001.; Bloomfield, D., Collins, K., Fry, C., and Munton, R.: Deliberation and inclusion: vehicles for increasing trust in UK public governance, Environ. Plann. C, 19, 501–513, 2001.; Bohman, J. and Rehg, W.: Deliberative democracy: essays on reason and politics, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1997.; Buchanan, J. M. and Tullock, G.: The Calculus of Consent, Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1962.; Breton, A. and Wintrobe, R.: The Equilibrium Size of a Budget-Maximizing Bureau: A Note on Niskanen's theory of Bureaucracy, J. Polit. Econ., 83(1), 195–207, 1975.; BMLUFW (Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wassertwirtschaft): Jahresbericht, 2005.; Brehm, J. and Gates, S.: Working, Shirking, and Sabotage: Bureaucratic Response to a Democratic Public, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 1997.; De Marchi, B. and Ravetz, J. R.: Participatory approaches to environmental policy, Cambridge research for the Environment, Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, 2001.; DETR: Guidance on enhancing public participation in local government, UK Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, London, 1998.; Downs, A.: Inside Bureaucracy, Little, Brown & Comp., Boston, 1967.; Eichenberger, R.: Verhaltensanomalien und Wirtschaftswissenschaft: Herausfroderungen, Reaktionen, Perpektiven, Wiesbaden, Deutscher Universitätsverlag, 1992.; Migué, J. L. and Bélanger, G.: Toward a general theory of managerial discretion, Public Choice, 17, 27–47, 1971.; Moe, T.: Political institutions: the neglected side of the story, J. Law Econ. Organ., 6, 213–253, 1990.; Epstein, D. and O'Halloran, S.: Delegating Powers: A Transaction Cost Politics Approach to Policy Making Under Separate Powers, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999.; European Commission: Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, PublicParticipation in Decision Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters, EU documents, Brussels, 1998.; Fiorina, M. P.: Legislative Choice of Regulatory Forms: Legal Process or Administrative Process?, Public Choice, 39, 33–66, 1982a.; Fiorina, M. P.: Group Concentration and the Delegation of Legislative Authority, in: Regulatory Policy and the Social Sciences, edited by: Noll, R. G., University of California Press, Berkeley, 1982b.; Frey, B. S.: Modern Political Economy, Robertson, Oxford, 1978.; Frey, B. S. and Kirchgässner, G.: Diskursethik, Politische Ökonomie und Volksabstimmungen, Analyse & Kritik, 15, 129–149, 1993.; Frey, B. S. and Kirchgässner, G.: Demokratische Wirtschaftspolitik, Vahlen, Munich, 2002.; Gullis, J. G. and Jones, P. R.: The Economics of Bureaucracy, The Growth of the Public Sector: Theories and International Evidence, edited by: Gemmell, N., Edward Elgar, Hants, 1993.; Hirschmann, A. O.: The Stability of Neutralism: A Geometrical Note, Am. Econ. Rev., 54, 94–100, 1964.; Kahnemann, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A.: Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982.; Langbein, L.: Bureaucratic Discretion, The Encyclopedia of Public Choice, edited by: Rowley, C. and Schneider, F., volume I, 53–58, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2003.; Kirchgässner, G.: Homo Oeconomicus: das ökonomische Modell individuellen Verhaltens und seine Anwendung in den Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, Mohr, Tübingen, 1991.; Messner, F., Zwirner, O., and Karkuschke, M.: Participation in multi-criteria decision support for the resolution of water allocation problem in the Spree river basin, Land Use Policy, 23, 63–75, 2006.; Mueller, D.: Public Choice III, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003.; Nisbett, R. and Ross, L.: Human Inference: Strategies a

 

Click To View

Additional Books


  • Hydrologic Sensitivity of Flood Runoff a... (by )
  • Observation of Surface Features on an Ac... (by )
  • Three Attempts of Earthquake Prediction ... (by )
  • Performance of Storm Damage Functions: a... (by )
  • Estimation of Insurance Related Losses R... (by )
  • Laboratory Experiments on Rainfall-induc... (by )
  • Hybrid Neural Networks in Rainfall-inund... (by )
  • Physical and Numerical Modelling of a Be... (by )
  • Social and Economic Factors of the Natur... (by )
  • Assessment and Comparison of Extreme Sea... (by )
  • Locating Hidden River Courses Via Geo-te... (by )
  • Snow Drift: Acoustic Sensors for Avalanc... (by )
Scroll Left
Scroll Right

 



Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World eBook Fair are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.